Getting the mixture right?

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Since the local elevation is about 6500 feet and the trike was originally set up at a somewhat lower altitude, It was not surprising to find a lot of carbon buildup on the plugs after 6 or so hours of running.  I changed the main jets from 165s to 158s and that seemed to make for better running at higher rpm without higher EGT.  Idle and fast idle were still rough so I moved the needle clips up to the next to leanest groove.  This improved smoothness at high idle alright but EGT went up, particularly at cruise RPM.  So I backed down a notch.  At this point, the fact that one side of the Dual EGT was reading hot while the other was not came into play. (This existed from the time I first saw the trike run.)  Switching probes from one side to the other did not change which gauge side read high versus low so that pretty much meant it was a gauge problem.I tried to use the gauge from the Redback 503 but the connectors were wrong.  I tried to use the probes from the Redback but they were a different size.  Finally I found out I could use the exhaust manifold bushings from the 503 on the 582 so I could use the 503's probes and gauge.  To my surprise, I still had the same problem.  One side of the Redback's EGT persisted in readying high.  So which reading was right?  I finally rigged up a digital DMM that had a type K T/C input and attached it to a leg board.  Turned out that probes on both sides were showing about 1275 at cruise rpm (5400).  So, I took the needle clips back to the lowest level.  This brought both probe readings to around 1165 in climb and 1185 in cruise.  Now to get a good replacement dual EGT gauge.

In the process of pulling the top of the Outback's carbs, I noticed the O-rings were badly cracked.  I thus stole the O-rings from the gyro to fix this problem.  I think I now have 7 Bing 54 carbs.  I ordered 4 carb seal kits which just arrived so the gyro MZ engine with get its carb O-rings back shortly.  The Mallard 447 will also get a new throttle cable boot.

In the process of this testing, we are now up to about 10 hours on the rebuilt engine and about 50 landings.

582 outback trike on ground ready to fly

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
582_on_ground.jpg

Third flight of the Outback

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
DSC00035.JPG

DSC00044.JPG


A 582 Outback 2-place

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
I brought an otherwise flyable Air Creations Outback trike to MTA yesterday afternoon--in a snow storm.  See picture.  It has a newly  rebuilt Rotax 582 engine (liquid cooled 2-stroke) and new prop.  It can take up a passenger by someone with the proper training/endorsement.  It has the same exact wing as the Mallard ultralight has been using.  It looks exactly like the broken RedBack (except for engine) as near as I can tell.  It does have the steering damper.  I did take a ride in it at Holbrook before I decided to take it.  It needs a little TLC though the tac only shows 177 hours.  (I have gotten conflicting stories about the number of hours.) Others how were familiar with the machine commented on how different the engine looks.  Mainly, it came back from rebuild with the oil injection system, intake silencer and after muffler all removed.  There are a few minor things to do--replace the electrical system circuit breaker, fix the airspeed indicator tube connector, patch small holes in the wings, ?

The 600 mile round trip was more or less uneventful except Monday morning it was so cold I could not get my pickup to start until I left the hood open with the sun shinning on the engine for a couple hours and late Monday afternoon the last 20 miles to MTA was on packed and snow covered highway 60.  The last half mile got really interesting as I could not get traction with my 2-wheel drive pickup pulling a trailer with the trike on it and we ended up sideways and every other which way spinning our wheels to get up the rise to our place in Mountainair.

I was very impressed with the long-tongued torsion bar suspension trailer that Richard Hastings made for the Redback.  Pretty much ideal for an open ultralight hauler. (see image)  Empty weight less than 500.  Trailed perfectly at all speeds up to 80 and both empty and loaded.  No extra bouncing or skipping in either case.  Good selection of tie-down spots.

The impact of different configurations on driving was interesting.  With just the empty trailer going out, it did not feel like anything was there and I did not notice any speed or acceleration difference.  Mileage did drop from usual winter 24 mpg to 19 though.  Coming back with the trike on, it felt like there was a brake on or someone had thrown out an earth anchor.  I could not run more than 65 with the mast up (except when I could get in tight and draft behind a semi going the right speed)  and mileage dropped to 14 mpg.  Once I dropped the mast, I was able to get to 75 with generous use of 4th gear on slight inclines even-though the pull or drag felt nearly the same.  Bottom line is that my little old worn-out 1999 S-10 4-banger 5 speed is marginal for pulling a trike.

snow_1.jpg

snow_2.jpg

Chipping Away at the Bucket List...

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
charles_4.jpg


charles_7.jpg


First Flight of 2013

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
I got in my first flight of 2013 before sunset this evening.  Air was really smooth and my gear was warm enough for the cool temperature.  This was in the Mallard ultralight.  It was the best flight I have had in it to-date. The changes I made, calm air and added experience seemed to add up.  I still have big PIO when I start getting down low and try to line up with the runway but I have always had some issue with this.  Still, my landing was not great but still much better than the last several.

Trike Shelter at the Airport

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
As noted previously, it turned out not to be practical for me to break down the wing and take the Mallard home every time.This resulted in the trike sitting tied down outside for some number of weeks after I got it.

The fastest way to get a viable temporary shelter for it with things I had on hand was to take a 50 foot long, 10 foot wide van box I had and use it as secured storage and a sidewall for a "arched lean-to" using heavy duty deep ribbed Quonset hut type panels I had.  Six panels end to end are half a full arch and come out with about 50 feet of total width and enough height for the trike's king post to clear.

I got emergency town council approval to put this temporary shelter up with an application for leasing the property it is on at the same time.  I have 26 feet of the intended 50 feet of length up.  I have hung tarps at the ends to reduce the wind blowing through and sun exposure early and late in the day.  It is in this partial state as I still don't have a signed lease back from the town.

Once complete it should be able to shelter 3 or 4 trikes.

ultralights_0.jpg

ultralights_1.jpg


Stable flight

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
charles_redback.JPG

Flight of the Mallard

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
mallard112012.jpg

The image above is my first flight of the Mallard after all the things were done to get it to the place that I felt I had enough control to actually fly it some place--over the CAVLON warehouse property.  Our inventory person Linda took this image.  I made two flights on this day.

The Mallard ultralight has proven to be a challenge to fly.  My first flight in it was a horrifying experience.  It took me 45 minutes to get enough control to get it landed--most of that time I did not think I would make it back in one piece.  The problem was extreme lateral PIO.  It also seemed to take extreme control bar movement and a long delay to make anything happen.  It was also a bit turbulent air by the time I got up which did not help.  I went back up on a subsequent calm morning but experienced similar results, wishing I had not gone up the instant I was in the air. I did manage to land quickly on the first pass--ugly landing but all was still intact.  My local ultralight buddy Claudio with a lot more trike time then flew it and had the same trouble.  Took 3 passes to land.  Said he would not fly it again.

There was a lot of discussion back and forth with others more knowledgeable about these things.  We changed the hang point to the forward hole as the person I got it from could not remember where he had flown it--he assembled it in the middle hole when he brought it to me months ago.  We did a hang test and found the CG was forward such that the front tire was only a couple inches above the rears.  We moved the seat all the way back which got the nose about 8 inches high.  Hop tests showed about 12 inches of air under the nose when the rears came off.  The seat move meant I could not reach the pedals anymore so I turned some wood extensions out of a piece of firewood.

I had our instructor Frank come out and fly it.  Even though he is vastly more experienced with a variety of trikes and wings, he also experienced the PIO problem.  After an hour or so of flying, he got relatively on top the PIO problem--finding that it was extremely sensitive to control bar movement.  Generally that it was necessary to take hands off the bar to get PIO to stop.  Several had speculated that the Wizard 3 wing from a 2 place was just too much wing for a true ultralight trike.  We grabbed a 50 pound bag of sand and Frank flew sitting on that.  He reported considerable improvement regarding the PIO but had trouble reaching the pedals at that point. It also moved the cg forward such that the nose wheel landed only slightly after the rears.  He said the trike was otherwise a very good unit and flew fine except for the control sensitivity.  When flying without the extra weight, he could not get it to stall.

I found some lead sheets that weigh 25 pounds each and folded 3 of them into the back of the seat.  These were behind the hang-point and moved me slightly forward for better pedal reach which left the CG just about in the right place.

I did some high-speed taxi and short just above the runway hops but it was about 10 days before there was calm enough wind at the right time for me to try it.  That came on a Friday afternoon a couple weeks ago while I was working on the temporary hanger.  The first flight was too the west and included the image above.  I found that there was still a  strong tendency to lateral PIO but it was manageable, primarily by just letting the control bar go.  With no instruments, it was hard to know but I am guessing I was 500 feet and above.  When I landed, the weather was still nice and Claudio had his trike out so we took off with him in the lead. I caught up with him a few miles out and went outside his turning to the east as I was going faster.   He then went behind and above me and I soon lost him in the low sun.  I headed away form where I figured he would be and made a big non-round circle about 7 miles to the North of the airport.  I landed right about sunset--Claudio was already hangered and ready to drive away.  About 2 hours of flight time that day--burned down to about only half a gallon left when I landed.

I added a little review mirror as I found that I could not look behind me with all my cold weather gear.  The main issue being I could not see the fuel tank right behind the seat to know how much was or was not left.  I added a sort of digital kitchen timer also as I had no way of knowing how long I had been flying.  I also added an electronic AGL altimeter so that I can tell how much higher I am than the airport where I take off.  I tried to add an automotive electronic compass, clock, temperature thing but it has fallen off twice in taxi tests so it is not getting mounted until I find a positive solution.  I had previously added a rotor meter type airspeed indicator to the control bar.

Yesterday turned out to be the calmest day we have seen in a long time.  I did a bunch of runway hops in the morning, about an hours worth and probably more than 20 times off the ground.  Claudio and I headed back out to the airport about 3 pm and he took off and I followed a few minutes later.  We had previously discussed what we would do and where we would go in the air so as to not run into each other.  We had radios this time which worked great on the ground but not so well in the air.  I could hear Claudio the whole time but not understand him about 50% of the time.  He could not understand me at all and eventually could not even hear me.  Found out that my radio battery was wimpy, providing enough power for me to receive but not enough to transmit. (I already have a new battery on order.)  Claudio kept talking even-though he could not hear me so I had a general idea where he was the whole way.  I stayed low, I am guessing about 300 feet (I forgot to set my new AGL altimeter before I took off) and Claudio was high (1500?) and behind.  We headed East toward the 100 MW windmill farm SE of Willard.  It was so calm some of them were not turning at all (first time I have ever seen that).  By 10 minutes out, Claudio had lost site of me.  I did some turns and he picked me up only to loose me again a few minutes later.  I continued East below and about 3 miles to the North of the bluff the windmills are on.  Claudio flew above and up to the first windmill.  I turned back at about 30 minutes out and past most of the windmills.  I went NE over the first of the mud flats.  Then directly West just South of Willard and over a very large cattle operation I did not previously know existed.Once I crossed the railroad tracks, I followed them back toward Mountainair until I got close to the airport. I did a fast lowish pass over the runway to check our wind indicators and then straight on West, keeping North of the area I believed Claudio to be using.  Once straight North of the CAVLON compound, I turned South and then circled over several times.  I could see Linda running to get her camera so I circled a couple more times--but it was only enough for her to get one image.  I would have circled longer but I could see in the mirror that my fuel was getting low--down to a gallon when I landed.  I could hear Claudio on the Radio more clearly as I headed back to the airport so I knew he had already landed.  I made about my worst landing yet--in the weeds--simulating and off-airport landing I guess.  The trike is really tolerant to rough terrain, including running over some old tires.

A few conclusions at this point.  It is still very sensitive to lateral control bar input and resulting PIO.  If I do anything else like try to focus on something, look up at the wing, look in the mirror, find the push to talk button, etc. I start PIOing badly.  Getting back off the bar stops it fairly quickly (in calm air).  It is burning a good 2.5 gallons per hour.  With the current hang point and weight, I have to run about 5800 rpm to maintain level flight. 

Broken Airborne RedBack 503 2-place Trike

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
This craft came from Australia with a 17.5 Wizard 3 wing.  It is intended as a trainer although the 50 hp 503 engine is a bit weak for our 6500 foot elevation.  It was originally purchased and used as a trainer by Richard Hastings.  At about 120 hours, he replaced the Wizard 3 wing with a small fast wing.  He had not gotten the optional steering damper.   The higher speed landing resulted in severe nose wheel shimmy that ended in loss of control and a roll over of the trike.  The new wing got torn up. The mast mount adapter bent. The propeller shattered. The left mast support wire broke.  The top plate the holds the mast broke and the bottom one bent.  The left trailing landing gear strut bent.  The left passenger foot rest broke.

Parts are still available from the factory--about $3000 worth.

redback_640x480-2.jpg

redback_640x480.jpg